Was this the most anticipated song of the nineties? The decade’s ultimate band, whose previous album had become one of the biggest in history, releasing the lead single from their third LP. In this moment, Oasis were everything, and everywhere.
D’You Know What I Mean?, by Oasis (their 3rd of eight #1s)
1 week, from 13th – 20th July 1997
‘Definitely Maybe’ had the attitude, and the riffs, while ‘What’s the Story’ had the globe-straddling ambition, and huge pop choruses. ‘Be Here Now’ would have to go some to be even bigger than its predecessors… And ‘go some’ it did. Starting with the seven-minute lead…
Seven and a half minutes, in fact, that are completely overblown and ridiculous, and somehow still pretty boring. On the album version, clocking in at almost eight minutes, the scene is set with a full minute of helicopters, feedback, bleeping and blooping, before the song even starts. The first chorus doesn’t arrive until the two and a half minute mark. The final minute or so is more feedback, and psychedelic loops for good measure. Most of the verses are slow and plodding, with so many different tracks welded together that listening to it, especially on headphones, can be a trippy experience. There’s a decent song in there, somewhere, buried under a landslide of sound.
The best thing about ‘D’You Know What I Mean?’ is the lyrics, Oasis at their most Oasis-y. In fact it might as well be the Liam manifesto, with pearls like: Comin’ in a mess, Goin’ out in style, I ain’t good-looking but I’m someone’s child… and I met my maker, Made him cry… Is this his best vocal performance on an Oasis #1? Perhaps. And of course there are two Beatles references (The fool on the hill and I feel fine…) so blatant that Noel was clearly playing to the gallery.
It didn’t really matter what it sounded like, this was always going to go to number one, and the fact that it is so overblown and so far up its own arse makes for an interesting chart-topping record. (Though despite it selling almost 400,000 copies in its first week, Puff Daddy returned to the top a week later.) ‘Be Here Now’ was equally always going to be the year’s biggest album; but after early adulation, the critical response to it quickly soured. It is, how to say… a bit much. Obnoxious, overlong, overproduced, over-the-top. The problem was that Oasis were too big to edit, and they were taking far too much cocaine. Even the title of this record, ‘D’You Know What I Mean?’ sounds like a conversation with a drugged-up bore.
That’s not to say I don’t like ‘Be Here Now’ – it’s got some great tunes buried within it, and gets too much stick from people who probably haven’t listened to it in twenty-five years. And actually, so what if it’s a bloated whale-corpse of a record, made by a band who had spent two years gorging on champagne and coke…? That’s rock ‘n’ roll, baby. Perhaps one of the genre’s last great excesses, just two years out from the horrors of a new millennium. Which of the 21st century’s big rock bands would even attempt something so hideously gargantuan? Coldplay? Snow Patrol? Imagine Dragons…?
In my post on ‘Beetlebum’, I pinpointed that record as the start of the Britpop comedown. Blur had taken themselves off to bed as shivering, sweating wrecks. But ‘D’You Know What I Mean?’ is the sound of Oasis keeping the party going, for better or worse, even though the morning sun is creeping through the cracks in the blinds, as the song drones on and on, and on.
It became the second-longest #1 single ever, ahead of ‘Hey Jude’ but thirty seconds behind Meat Loaf’s ‘I Would Do Anything for Love’. Never ones to be denied, Oasis’s third single from ‘Be Here Now’ will be so long that it will make ‘D’You Know What I Mean?’ seem short and sweet by comparison. And that one will be making number one soon enough.


This is a great track as I love that its overblown and ridiculous, well said. Something about this tune and the album that for me is my favourite in the Oasis catalog.
Thanks! For me, they have much better singles and albums, but the size and sheer ridiculousness of the ‘Be Here Now’ era is to be admired.
I actually really enjoy Be Here Now the album despite it’s flaws (did Noel swipe that title from George Harrison’s song off Living in the Material World?). I obviously wasn’t alive when this album came out but listening it as a relative newcomer to Oasis and Britpop in general, I think it’s a really good album that could’ve been a damn great album if it A) was not so goddamn loud and overcompressed and B) the songs were trimmed. The songs are there and have great hooks, but the album does not need to be 71:31. A 55-minute length is the ideal. I hope they remix this album for it’s 30th anniversary. YouTube ToddintheShadows in his TrainWreckord video for Be Here Now compared the album to the Phantom Menace in terms of the swinging pendulum of fan reception (good>it has some weak spots but overall decent>very disappointing>worst thing in the world>ok it wasn’t that bad c’mon now), and I think that’s an apt comparison.
As for the song, I do enjoy the song, but it not “Rock and Roll Star” or “Hello”. It’s a good opener but it’s not an absolute barnburner of an opener those two songs were.
I know that ‘Wonderwall’ was a George Harrison reference, so wouldn’t be surprised if ‘Be Here Now’ was too.
Apparently Noel started re-working BHN in 2016, ahead of the 20th anniversary, but only got as far as remastering DYKWIM before losing interest.
And yeah, Oasis were great at Side One, Track One songs – ones that basically announce ‘Yes, you are listening to an Oasis album’ – on pretty much every LP.
While I can’t say it’s the best Oasis song I’ve ever heard, it’s not bad. D’you know what I mean?
In the very beginning, the music sounds a bit like they sampled from Alan Parsons Project “Lucifer”, and that wah-wah guitar reminds me of Hendrix. Granted he wasn’t the only guitarist who used the pedal but undoubtedly one of its most compelling users.
It wouldn’t be surprising if there were a sample or two in among all that noise. It also wouldn’t be a surprise if the band cannot remember in the slightest, given how much they were enjoying the rock n roll lifestyle at that time…
It’s not bad at all…and…it beats the hell out of the dance tracks that have been hitting this spot…I never heard it before…now I wasn’t there for the hype…not their best song but like I said…compare it to the other number ones…and it’s a classic.
The one thing I’ll give this one is how crisp the video quality is. Who knew a video from ’97 could look so sharp? ‘
Yes I wonder if it’s been tweaked or remastered at some point?